The world is full of music. Over
time different types of music have assimilated together to form entirely new
genres of music. Folk music is an ideal
example of this assimilation. Folk music
came about from various artists interpreting a song in their own way and
performing the song the way they think it should be performed. While some genres of music fall cleanly into
their specific category, folk music can’t be encapsulated into one little box. Folk music is defined by its originality and
uniqueness that transcends through multiple generations.
Many sources attempt to create a
clean cut definition of folk music and that simply isn’t possible. The cultural diversity that is the backbone
of folk music creates an infinite number of different interpretations of folk
music. Nettl’s categories could be
somewhat useful to someone who is searching for a clean cut definition of what
folk, “primitive”, and cultivated music engulfs. Even so, Nettl’s ideas about the different
categories of folk music are puzzling.
At one point in his essay he states, “The difference between folk and
primitive music is largely a reflection of the differences between folk and
non-literate cultures; but we can also distinguish these two kinds of music by
their styles, by the way they sound (Nettl 4).”
Nettl’s use of the word primitive comes with a negative connotation that
implies uneducated or inferior. In that
statement he is making the parallel that primitive music comes from those
cultures that are non-literate while folk music is produced by cultures that
are more developed. A few paragraphs
later he explains that while Africa is classified as primitive continent, it
was able to produce some of the most elaborate and complex music. Not only is he presenting conflicting ideas
about primitive music but he is insulting that form of music as well. Nettl’s terminology is confusing and he
failed in his attempt to decipher the differences between folk music and
primitive music.
Nettl is more successful when he
speaks to what the function of music is.
His description of the function of music relates to the contrasting
categories of passive music versus participatory music. Nettl makes a good point when he explains
that within each culture the function of music depends upon how much the members
are invested in the music. Depending on
the culture, the amount of participation will vary. The number of professional
musicians and unspecialized musicians affects the amount of participation that
is taking place between the performer and the audience. If there are more professional musicians the
amount of participation will be less.
The different interactions between the performer and the audience are one
reason why all folk music is unique. An
example of this would be the differences between attending a Dave Matthews
concert and walking along the streets of downtown Ithaca to view the musical
festival Porchfest. Both venues are
examples of folk music. However, the
concert setting is more passive than the Porchfest setting. While each venue has its strong and weak
points, neither venue could claim to be better than the other. The different types of passive and
participatory music clearly demonstrate the diversity of folk music.
Another important function of
music that Nettl addresses is the idea of functional music versus narrative
music. Although his thoughts concerning
this topic are brief, they are significant.
He states that an important function of folk music is the accompaniment of
a narration, and that narrative songs are in primitive music. While his thoughts about primitive music may
be flawed, his explanation that narration plays a key role in folk music is
spot on. A majority of the enjoyment
that comes from folk music is the audience discovering the story behind the
lyrics or notes. The infinite number of
stories that can be told through music adds to the assortment of different
tunes that artists can create. One song may
have different meanings depending on how the audience interprets it. Folk music is beautiful because it often
allows the listener to decide what story is being relayed to him or her.
Overall,
Nettl’s essay was fairly accurate in describing what folk music
represents. He may have been more
successful had he compared the different uses of folk music. He talked about the function of music but never
spoke to the variety of the different venues or different groups of people that
listen to folk music. Through an
explanation of how folk music is used in society he and his readers may have
been able to grasp the concept of folk music more readily. The ideas Nettl explained in his essay are a
good way to bounce one’s own ideas off of and create their own interpretations
of folk music instead of accepting everything Nettl has to say.